<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Centre Cannot Hold &#187; English</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecentrecannothold.net/tag/english/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecentrecannothold.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:17:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>The Campaign for Symmetrical English</title>
		<link>http://thecentrecannothold.net/blog/the-campaign-for-symmetrical-english-introduction/</link>
		<comments>http://thecentrecannothold.net/blog/the-campaign-for-symmetrical-english-introduction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 21:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Loki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign for Symmetrical English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Station Keeping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prefix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suffix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symmetrical english]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecentrecannothold.net/2008/04/07/the-campaign-for-symmetrical-english-introduction/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about the rest of you, but the general inconsistency of English has always bothered me. Especially with regard to prefixes, suffixes and infixes. There are so many words that exist in only one form where there should be more. Prefixes are the worst offenders in this regard &#8211; a lot of words [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about the rest of you, but the general inconsistency of English has always bothered me. Especially with regard to prefixes, suffixes and infixes. There are so many words that exist in only one form where there should be more. Prefixes are the worst offenders in this regard &#8211; a lot of words exist only with a prefix form, where they should logically possess a non-prefixed form as well.<br />
<span id="more-86"></span><br />
So, don&#8217;t tell me that English isn&#8217;t logical &#8211; I&#8217;m keenly aware of that fact, and indeed, enjoy it on a daily basis. I&#8217;m just saying. English can be logical, and there&#8217;s a huge harvest of fun new words just waiting to be picked up.</p>
<p>Hope you&#8217;ll come along for the ride.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fthecentrecannothold.net%2Fblog%2Fthe-campaign-for-symmetrical-english-introduction%2F&amp;title=The%20Campaign%20for%20Symmetrical%20English" id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://thecentrecannothold.net/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thecentrecannothold.net/blog/the-campaign-for-symmetrical-english-introduction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

