| From: |
Katheryne Hall |
| To: |
Cornelius Andersen |
| Date: |
15, 12:30 |
| Subject: |
Re: Re: Corny, what is this? |
Sorry for the delay in getting back to you, Katheryne my dear, but I wanted to be sure that everything was done right, and you know how non-management types are – you practically have to stand right behind them the whole time to get them to do their jobs right.
My initial, highly informal investigation suggests that there may well be something awry, just as you say. I didn’t want to believe this, of course – who ever wants to think that their own company is at fault? – but I cannot rule it out to my satisfaction. Bloody Greta says that I’m suffering from “confirmation bias”, whatever that is, but I suspect that she’s just trying to protect her people.
As much as I can sympathise with her loyalties, I think that she has allowed sentiment to overwhelm business practicality on this occasion. I want to be sure this is done right. So I would ask that you temporarily put any legal actions you are planning on hold, while I call in an independent auditor of the utmost probity to ensure that the impartial truth is reached. Naturally, if the auditor’s findings do not exonerate us, I would be happy to discuss appropriate restitution, and you will find me quite sympathetic and accomodating.
I hope this is suitable for you, and I apologise for the delay that this audit will entail, but I think it is important that we not only do the right thing, but that we are seen to do the right thing, don’t you?